<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1022 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766475</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeals was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation for the 94-day delay. At the interim stage, the Court found that the Tribunal had not independently examined the factual record and had relied on an earlier coordinate Bench order, while the appeals raised a broader dispute over imported consignments, alleged contamination with municipal, domestic and biomedical waste, and the applicable statutory regime for hazardous waste. The Tribunal&#039;s direction was therefore kept in abeyance pending disposal of the appeals, and the respondent was allowed to re-export the cargo at its risk and cost on written consent and compliance with formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1022 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766475</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeals was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation for the 94-day delay. At the interim stage, the Court found that the Tribunal had not independently examined the factual record and had relied on an earlier coordinate Bench order, while the appeals raised a broader dispute over imported consignments, alleged contamination with municipal, domestic and biomedical waste, and the applicable statutory regime for hazardous waste. The Tribunal&#039;s direction was therefore kept in abeyance pending disposal of the appeals, and the respondent was allowed to re-export the cargo at its risk and cost on written consent and compliance with formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>