<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1036 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766489</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147, finding that the AO&#039;s reasons for believing income escaped assessment were vague, scanty and ambiguous. The AO merely recorded in three lines that income was believed to have escaped assessment without providing details about source, nature or timing of alleged undisclosed credits. The tribunal held that reassessment cannot proceed on such insufficient grounds lacking independent application of mind by the AO. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1036 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766489</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147, finding that the AO&#039;s reasons for believing income escaped assessment were vague, scanty and ambiguous. The AO merely recorded in three lines that income was believed to have escaped assessment without providing details about source, nature or timing of alleged undisclosed credits. The tribunal held that reassessment cannot proceed on such insufficient grounds lacking independent application of mind by the AO. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>