https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766490 Inordinate delay of more than 10 years and 11 years in filing appeals before the first appellate authority was not supported by any proper day-to-day explanation, so sufficient cause was not shown for condonation. The distinction between ordinary delay and inordinate delay was applied, with leniency treated as appropriate only in cases of normal delay. On that basis, the request to overlook the delay was declined and the dismissal of the appeals by the first appellate authority was upheld. en-us Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766490 Inordinate delay of more than 10 years and 11 years in filing appeals before the first appellate authority was not supported by any proper day-to-day explanation, so sufficient cause was not shown for condonation. The distinction between ordinary delay and inordinate delay was applied, with leniency treated as appropriate only in cases of normal delay. On that basis, the request to overlook the delay was declined and the dismissal of the appeals by the first appellate authority was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766490