<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460862</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on service tax paid for railway freight used to transport inputs, where the goods were received in the factory without dispute and the freight and tax were separately reflected in the supplier&#039;s invoice. The supplier had paid the freight and service tax on the buyer&#039;s behalf and was treated as a pure agent for transportation charges. On those facts, credit on the input service of railway freight was available to the buyer, and denial of the credit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460862</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on service tax paid for railway freight used to transport inputs, where the goods were received in the factory without dispute and the freight and tax were separately reflected in the supplier&#039;s invoice. The supplier had paid the freight and service tax on the buyer&#039;s behalf and was treated as a pure agent for transportation charges. On those facts, credit on the input service of railway freight was available to the buyer, and denial of the credit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>