<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HC quashes MMRDA&#039;s contract termination notice to Systra; state agency denies graft charges</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=35283</link>
    <description>The High Court held that MMRDA&#039;s discontinuation of Systra&#039;s services was arbitrary and unfair because it terminated the extended consultancy contract without assigning reasons or hearing the company; the court quashed the termination notice and directed the authority to take a fresh decision after affording Systra an opportunity to be heard, while not addressing the substantive merits of the corruption allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HC quashes MMRDA&#039;s contract termination notice to Systra; state agency denies graft charges</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=35283</link>
      <description>The High Court held that MMRDA&#039;s discontinuation of Systra&#039;s services was arbitrary and unfair because it terminated the extended consultancy contract without assigning reasons or hearing the company; the court quashed the termination notice and directed the authority to take a fresh decision after affording Systra an opportunity to be heard, while not addressing the substantive merits of the corruption allegations.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=35283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>