<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41659</link>
    <description>Buyer-supplied gas cylinders that remained the buyer&#039;s property were not part of the manufacturer&#039;s packing cost and could not be added to the assessable value of the gas for excise duty. The assessable value under section 4(d)(i) was confined to the goods actually sold, here the gas alone, so duty was to be computed on that basis under Item 14H. A later notification on durable packing did not alter this position where the cost of the buyer-owned cylinders was otherwise not includible in the excisable value. The direction to proceed on provisional assessment by including cylinder cost was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41659</link>
      <description>Buyer-supplied gas cylinders that remained the buyer&#039;s property were not part of the manufacturer&#039;s packing cost and could not be added to the assessable value of the gas for excise duty. The assessable value under section 4(d)(i) was confined to the goods actually sold, here the gas alone, so duty was to be computed on that basis under Item 14H. A later notification on durable packing did not alter this position where the cost of the buyer-owned cylinders was otherwise not includible in the excisable value. The direction to proceed on provisional assessment by including cylinder cost was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>