https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460859 Previous sanction under Section 188 CrPC was unnecessary because part of the offence occurred in India, so the case did not fall within the proviso requiring Central Government sanction. The evidence of the prosecutrix and supporting witnesses, together with identification, recovery, and corroboration, established that the victim was induced to travel from Nepal into India for exploitation. Medical board evidence based on radiological and dental examination supported the finding that the victim was below 18 years of age, attracting Section 370(4) IPC. The convictions and sentences were affirmed. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:00:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460859 Previous sanction under Section 188 CrPC was unnecessary because part of the offence occurred in India, so the case did not fall within the proviso requiring Central Government sanction. The evidence of the prosecutrix and supporting witnesses, together with identification, recovery, and corroboration, established that the victim was induced to travel from Nepal into India for exploitation. Medical board evidence based on radiological and dental examination supported the finding that the victim was below 18 years of age, attracting Section 370(4) IPC. The convictions and sentences were affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460859