<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2864 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460850</link>
    <description>Assessment orders under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act concerning supply of set-top boxes were quashed because the authority failed to consider the material contractual covenants governing supply and retention, and did not provide a proper opportunity of hearing. The court treated this omission as denial of justice and an apparent error on the face of the record. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with directions to hear the petitioner, permit additional evidence if necessary, and record reasons and findings on the relevant contractual terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:16:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2864 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460850</link>
      <description>Assessment orders under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act concerning supply of set-top boxes were quashed because the authority failed to consider the material contractual covenants governing supply and retention, and did not provide a proper opportunity of hearing. The court treated this omission as denial of justice and an apparent error on the face of the record. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with directions to hear the petitioner, permit additional evidence if necessary, and record reasons and findings on the relevant contractual terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>