<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 64 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41656</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused under Section 135 of the Customs Act due to an invalid sanction provided by the Collector of Customs. The court found that the sanction did not cover specific contraventions under relevant sections of the Act, leading to a lack of jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offense. As a result, the accused was acquitted, and the criminal revision was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 64 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41656</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused under Section 135 of the Customs Act due to an invalid sanction provided by the Collector of Customs. The court found that the sanction did not cover specific contraventions under relevant sections of the Act, leading to a lack of jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offense. As a result, the accused was acquitted, and the criminal revision was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>