<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41655</link>
    <description>The Court quashes the Assistant Collector&#039;s orders and consequential demands in a case concerning the classification of blended spun yarn under tariff Item 18 III(i) or (ii). The petitioners alleged a violation of natural justice due to inadequate hearing opportunities. The Court emphasizes the need for factual inquiries to determine the presence of man-made fiber of non-cellulosic origin in the petitioners&#039; product. While refraining from a definitive ruling on the substance, the Court directs a fresh consideration with proper hearing opportunities and provisional clearance based on the petitioners&#039; classification. The Assistant Collector is reminded to act independently and objectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41655</link>
      <description>The Court quashes the Assistant Collector&#039;s orders and consequential demands in a case concerning the classification of blended spun yarn under tariff Item 18 III(i) or (ii). The petitioners alleged a violation of natural justice due to inadequate hearing opportunities. The Court emphasizes the need for factual inquiries to determine the presence of man-made fiber of non-cellulosic origin in the petitioners&#039; product. While refraining from a definitive ruling on the substance, the Court directs a fresh consideration with proper hearing opportunities and provisional clearance based on the petitioners&#039; classification. The Assistant Collector is reminded to act independently and objectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>