<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41651</link>
    <description>Gudaku was treated as tobacco for sales tax purposes because it was manufactured from tobacco and retained its essential character despite added ingredients; occasional use for cleaning teeth did not make it tooth-paste or dentifrice. On that basis, it was also held outside the entry for tooth-paste or tooth-powder under the Calcutta Metropolitan Area entry tax schedule. The dispute was further treated as involving a jurisdictional fact on exemption, so writ jurisdiction remained available notwithstanding statutory remedies. The levy and collection of tax on gudaku were therefore set aside and the exemption claim accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41651</link>
      <description>Gudaku was treated as tobacco for sales tax purposes because it was manufactured from tobacco and retained its essential character despite added ingredients; occasional use for cleaning teeth did not make it tooth-paste or dentifrice. On that basis, it was also held outside the entry for tooth-paste or tooth-powder under the Calcutta Metropolitan Area entry tax schedule. The dispute was further treated as involving a jurisdictional fact on exemption, so writ jurisdiction remained available notwithstanding statutory remedies. The levy and collection of tax on gudaku were therefore set aside and the exemption claim accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>