<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41649</link>
    <description>The court held that sawn timber, planks, and cut sizes are not different commercial commodities from nascent timber. The process of cutting timber into smaller sizes does not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; as it does not result in a new commodity. Therefore, the goods in question were not considered &#039;excisable goods&#039; under the Central Excises Act. The impugned show cause notices were quashed, and the rule in each case was made absolute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:20:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41649</link>
      <description>The court held that sawn timber, planks, and cut sizes are not different commercial commodities from nascent timber. The process of cutting timber into smaller sizes does not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; as it does not result in a new commodity. Therefore, the goods in question were not considered &#039;excisable goods&#039; under the Central Excises Act. The impugned show cause notices were quashed, and the rule in each case was made absolute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>