<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41632</link>
    <description>Medicinal preparations containing alcohol remained covered by Item 1 of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 where they were patent or proprietary medicines and not capable of being consumed as ordinary alcoholic beverages; semi-solid form did not exclude them from excise liability. For valuation, a price charged to a distributor was not accepted as the real value where the manufacturer and distributor were not dealing at arm&#039;s length, with common premises and overlapping family participation indicating identity of interest. In that setting, wholesale price was the proper basis for excise valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41632</link>
      <description>Medicinal preparations containing alcohol remained covered by Item 1 of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 where they were patent or proprietary medicines and not capable of being consumed as ordinary alcoholic beverages; semi-solid form did not exclude them from excise liability. For valuation, a price charged to a distributor was not accepted as the real value where the manufacturer and distributor were not dealing at arm&#039;s length, with common premises and overlapping family participation indicating identity of interest. In that setting, wholesale price was the proper basis for excise valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>