<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41610</link>
    <description>Vegetable non-essential oil used to produce hardened vegetable oil could not claim exemption under Notification No. 33/63-Central Excise where the proviso denied relief if the finished excisable goods were themselves fully exempt or chargeable at nil rate. The hardened vegetable oil was treated by the manufacturers as the relevant finished excisable product under tariff item 13 and had already obtained a separate exemption. Because that finished product was wholly exempt, the oil used in its manufacture did not qualify for the claimed exemption, even though the hardened oil was later used in soap manufacture. Duty was therefore payable on the oil.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:28:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41610</link>
      <description>Vegetable non-essential oil used to produce hardened vegetable oil could not claim exemption under Notification No. 33/63-Central Excise where the proviso denied relief if the finished excisable goods were themselves fully exempt or chargeable at nil rate. The hardened vegetable oil was treated by the manufacturers as the relevant finished excisable product under tariff item 13 and had already obtained a separate exemption. Because that finished product was wholly exempt, the oil used in its manufacture did not qualify for the claimed exemption, even though the hardened oil was later used in soap manufacture. Duty was therefore payable on the oil.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>