https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766403 Where a statutory appellate remedy is available against an order confirming duty demands, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked unless a recognised exceptional ground is shown, such as breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, violation of fundamental rights, or challenge to vires. The Court found no such ground here and held the writ petition not maintainable, relegating the petitioner to the appellate remedy. The plea of denial of personal hearing was also rejected because the record showed multiple virtual hearing opportunities were given and neither the petitioner nor the authorised representative appeared. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:06:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766403 Where a statutory appellate remedy is available against an order confirming duty demands, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked unless a recognised exceptional ground is shown, such as breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, violation of fundamental rights, or challenge to vires. The Court found no such ground here and held the writ petition not maintainable, relegating the petitioner to the appellate remedy. The plea of denial of personal hearing was also rejected because the record showed multiple virtual hearing opportunities were given and neither the petitioner nor the authorised representative appeared. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766403