https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766412 The challenge concerned alleged illegality in the arrest and whether the petitioner was not produced before the Special Court within 24 hours as required by law. The SC found no ground to interfere with the High Court's order and dismissed the SLP. It clarified that the impugned judgment would not prevent the petitioner from raising all available contentions in an appropriate remedy under law. The petitioner was left free to pursue the pending regular bail application before the High Court, which was requested to hear the matter expeditiously. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:24:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766412 The challenge concerned alleged illegality in the arrest and whether the petitioner was not produced before the Special Court within 24 hours as required by law. The SC found no ground to interfere with the High Court's order and dismissed the SLP. It clarified that the impugned judgment would not prevent the petitioner from raising all available contentions in an appropriate remedy under law. The petitioner was left free to pursue the pending regular bail application before the High Court, which was requested to hear the matter expeditiously. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766412