<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 959 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766412</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition, upholding the HC&#039;s impugned order. The SC clarified that the petitioner retains the right to raise all contentions in seeking legal remedies. Despite the impugned order, the petitioner is granted liberty to pursue the bail application before the HC. The SC urged the HC to expedite the hearing on the pending bail application. Any pending application(s) were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 959 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766412</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition, upholding the HC&#039;s impugned order. The SC clarified that the petitioner retains the right to raise all contentions in seeking legal remedies. Despite the impugned order, the petitioner is granted liberty to pursue the bail application before the HC. The SC urged the HC to expedite the hearing on the pending bail application. Any pending application(s) were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>