<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766438</link>
    <description>The notice under Section 148 for assessment year 2016-17 was held to be barred by limitation because the six-year period under Section 149(1)(b) expired on 31.03.2022, and the notice was issued afterwards. Earlier proceedings under Section 148A(b) and Section 148A(d) did not save the notice from the limitation bar. The reopening could therefore not be sustained, and the impugned notice was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:25:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766438</link>
      <description>The notice under Section 148 for assessment year 2016-17 was held to be barred by limitation because the six-year period under Section 149(1)(b) expired on 31.03.2022, and the notice was issued afterwards. Earlier proceedings under Section 148A(b) and Section 148A(d) did not save the notice from the limitation bar. The reopening could therefore not be sustained, and the impugned notice was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>