https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766442 Article 226 writ jurisdiction cannot be used to compel the Income Tax Department to investigate alleged cash transactions arising from a matrimonial dispute when no enforceable statutory or fundamental right is shown. The requested mandamus was based on contested private allegations and disputed facts, and the complaint was not shown to have been made under any statutory scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As the relief would require a roving inquiry into hotly contested matters, the High Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable and rejected the request for investigation. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:24:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766442 Article 226 writ jurisdiction cannot be used to compel the Income Tax Department to investigate alleged cash transactions arising from a matrimonial dispute when no enforceable statutory or fundamental right is shown. The requested mandamus was based on contested private allegations and disputed facts, and the complaint was not shown to have been made under any statutory scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As the relief would require a roving inquiry into hotly contested matters, the High Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable and rejected the request for investigation. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766442