<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 996 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766449</link>
    <description>A GST appeal filed within the one-month condonable period under Section 107(4) of the Karnataka GST Act, though three days late, should be considered on merits where sufficient cause for the short delay is shown. The appellate authority rejected the appeal solely on limitation without properly exercising its discretion or examining the explanation for delay. The Karnataka HC held that the discretion under Section 107(4) was not applied judiciously and that the delay was condonable, with the appeal to be heard on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 996 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766449</link>
      <description>A GST appeal filed within the one-month condonable period under Section 107(4) of the Karnataka GST Act, though three days late, should be considered on merits where sufficient cause for the short delay is shown. The appellate authority rejected the appeal solely on limitation without properly exercising its discretion or examining the explanation for delay. The Karnataka HC held that the discretion under Section 107(4) was not applied judiciously and that the delay was condonable, with the appeal to be heard on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>