<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 936 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766389</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur quashed notice under section 148 of IT Act issued by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur for lack of jurisdiction. The tribunal held that under section 124 of IT Act, the case fell under territorial jurisdiction of ITO Ward 70(3), Delhi. Since the Income-tax Department did not exercise powers under sections 120 or 127 for jurisdictional transfer, the notice and subsequent proceedings were deemed illegal and quashed. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 936 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766389</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur quashed notice under section 148 of IT Act issued by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur for lack of jurisdiction. The tribunal held that under section 124 of IT Act, the case fell under territorial jurisdiction of ITO Ward 70(3), Delhi. Since the Income-tax Department did not exercise powers under sections 120 or 127 for jurisdictional transfer, the notice and subsequent proceedings were deemed illegal and quashed. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>