<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 933 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766386</link>
    <description>A challenge to cancellation of GST registration was not sustained, even though the Court noted that the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 did not bar a fresh registration application and referred to the applicable circular. The absence of any statutory prohibition on seeking registration afresh did not cure the challenge to the cancellation order itself. The writ petition was therefore dismissed, while liberty was granted to apply again for registration under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 933 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766386</link>
      <description>A challenge to cancellation of GST registration was not sustained, even though the Court noted that the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 did not bar a fresh registration application and referred to the applicable circular. The absence of any statutory prohibition on seeking registration afresh did not cure the challenge to the cancellation order itself. The writ petition was therefore dismissed, while liberty was granted to apply again for registration under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>