<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 909 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766362</link>
    <description>Seized foreign currency was subject to confiscation with an option of redemption on payment of fine and penalty. The petitioner sought release on the basis of willingness to comply, but the Department had already filed an appeal against the order-in-original. In view of the pending departmental appeal, release of the currency was declined at that stage. The Court instead directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal expeditiously within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=800917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 909 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766362</link>
      <description>Seized foreign currency was subject to confiscation with an option of redemption on payment of fine and penalty. The petitioner sought release on the basis of willingness to comply, but the Department had already filed an appeal against the order-in-original. In view of the pending departmental appeal, release of the currency was declined at that stage. The Court instead directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal expeditiously within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>