https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766378 Proper service of notice under Section 169(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 was required in the prescribed modes, and the Madras HC applied its earlier batch ruling to hold that the assessment order could not be sustained where that service requirement was not met. The impugned order was set aside, the assessee was directed to file a reply to the show cause notice and be given a hearing, and the matter was to be decided afresh on merits in accordance with law. Any bank attachment was also to be lifted. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:05:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766378 Proper service of notice under Section 169(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 was required in the prescribed modes, and the Madras HC applied its earlier batch ruling to hold that the assessment order could not be sustained where that service requirement was not met. The impugned order was set aside, the assessee was directed to file a reply to the show cause notice and be given a hearing, and the matter was to be decided afresh on merits in accordance with law. Any bank attachment was also to be lifted. Case-Laws GST Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766378