https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41559 The court dismissed the appeal and writ petitions, ruling that there is no fundamental right for a person summoned under Section 108 of the Customs Act to have a lawyer present during interrogation. The court advised the department to allow the presence of lawyers during examinations while ensuring the confidentiality and secrecy of the investigation. The request for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was denied due to the absence of any significant legal question arising from the decision. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:41:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41559 The court dismissed the appeal and writ petitions, ruling that there is no fundamental right for a person summoned under Section 108 of the Customs Act to have a lawyer present during interrogation. The court advised the department to allow the presence of lawyers during examinations while ensuring the confidentiality and secrecy of the investigation. The request for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was denied due to the absence of any significant legal question arising from the decision. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41559