<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41548</link>
    <description>Plywood is treated as excisable at the panel or block stage where it emerges from the press as a commercially identifiable product under Item 16B, because Sections 2(f) and 3 tax goods produced or manufactured in India and further cutting into circles does not defer the levy. The scheme was read with Rule 9 to support duty collection at that stage, and notices based on that liability were valid. The ruling was then limited in practical effect: because of the prior assessment practice and hardship from reopening past periods, recovery was confined prospectively and earlier years were not to be reopened under the impugned notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41548</link>
      <description>Plywood is treated as excisable at the panel or block stage where it emerges from the press as a commercially identifiable product under Item 16B, because Sections 2(f) and 3 tax goods produced or manufactured in India and further cutting into circles does not defer the levy. The scheme was read with Rule 9 to support duty collection at that stage, and notices based on that liability were valid. The ruling was then limited in practical effect: because of the prior assessment practice and hardship from reopening past periods, recovery was confined prospectively and earlier years were not to be reopened under the impugned notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>