https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41547 The High Court held that the writ petition was not premature despite the availability of an alternative remedy, citing the delay in the revision process and repeated show-cause notices. Handyplast was determined not to be a medicinal preparation under Item 14E due to its lack of curative properties. The court did not address the time-barred nature of the impugned order and show cause notices. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute, denying the respondents' application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:39:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41547 The High Court held that the writ petition was not premature despite the availability of an alternative remedy, citing the delay in the revision process and repeated show-cause notices. Handyplast was determined not to be a medicinal preparation under Item 14E due to its lack of curative properties. The court did not address the time-barred nature of the impugned order and show cause notices. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute, denying the respondents' application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41547