https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460820 The Karnataka HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and notice issued by the second respondent under the IT Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Court found that the second respondent violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider the petitioner's responses submitted after the show cause notice deadline but before the order was passed. The matter was remitted back to the second respondent for reconsideration, with instructions to provide the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to be heard and to consider any further submissions. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:49:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460820 The Karnataka HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and notice issued by the second respondent under the IT Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Court found that the second respondent violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider the petitioner's responses submitted after the show cause notice deadline but before the order was passed. The matter was remitted back to the second respondent for reconsideration, with instructions to provide the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to be heard and to consider any further submissions. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460820