<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 888 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766341</link>
    <description>Imported goods classification turned on whether they fell under CTI 2309 9090 or CTH 29.36 for customs duty purposes. The CESTAT classified the goods under 2309 9090 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with that view, particularly in light of Circular No. 188/22/96-CX dated 26.03.1996. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=800608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 888 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766341</link>
      <description>Imported goods classification turned on whether they fell under CTI 2309 9090 or CTH 29.36 for customs duty purposes. The CESTAT classified the goods under 2309 9090 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with that view, particularly in light of Circular No. 188/22/96-CX dated 26.03.1996. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>