https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460816 Where a service grievance is raised through a pending representation, the State is expected to consider it and pass a reasoned speaking order rather than remain inactive. The High Court noted that although writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and the claim need not be accepted, public administration requires application of mind, fair consideration and observance of natural justice in dealing with employee representations. The petition was disposed of with a mandamus directing the respondent-State to examine the representation and issue a speaking order within 30 days, reflecting the duty to address service grievances through reasoned decision-making. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:44:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460816 Where a service grievance is raised through a pending representation, the State is expected to consider it and pass a reasoned speaking order rather than remain inactive. The High Court noted that although writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and the claim need not be accepted, public administration requires application of mind, fair consideration and observance of natural justice in dealing with employee representations. The petition was disposed of with a mandamus directing the respondent-State to examine the representation and issue a speaking order within 30 days, reflecting the duty to address service grievances through reasoned decision-making. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460816