<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1429 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460817</link>
    <description>Delhi HC upheld Industrial Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose costs on petitioner management for seeking repeated adjournments in a 2009 industrial dispute. Despite having three authorized representatives, petitioner sought multiple pass-overs and refused to cross-examine witnesses when offered. The court found this conduct aimed at protracting proceedings to frustrate the opposing party. HC emphasized adjournments are judicial courtesy, not counsel&#039;s right, and judicial efficiency takes precedence over repeated delay tactics. The petition was dismissed with additional costs of Rs. 20,000 to be deposited with DHCLSC within one week.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=800598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1429 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460817</link>
      <description>Delhi HC upheld Industrial Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose costs on petitioner management for seeking repeated adjournments in a 2009 industrial dispute. Despite having three authorized representatives, petitioner sought multiple pass-overs and refused to cross-examine witnesses when offered. The court found this conduct aimed at protracting proceedings to frustrate the opposing party. HC emphasized adjournments are judicial courtesy, not counsel&#039;s right, and judicial efficiency takes precedence over repeated delay tactics. The petition was dismissed with additional costs of Rs. 20,000 to be deposited with DHCLSC within one week.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>