https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766304 The SC set aside the HC's decision, which had rejected a petition challenging a provisional attachment order, citing the absence of a statutory remedy for the appellant. The case was remanded to the Punjab and Haryana HC for reconsideration on February 21, 2025. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed not to issue a final order before March 20, 2025. The SC directed the Registry to forward the order to the HC for listing the restored petition, leaving all merits open for the HC to decide. The appeal was partly allowed. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:30:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766304 The SC set aside the HC's decision, which had rejected a petition challenging a provisional attachment order, citing the absence of a statutory remedy for the appellant. The case was remanded to the Punjab and Haryana HC for reconsideration on February 21, 2025. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed not to issue a final order before March 20, 2025. The SC directed the Registry to forward the order to the HC for listing the restored petition, leaving all merits open for the HC to decide. The appeal was partly allowed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766304