https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766305 The SC allowed the appeal concerning the appellant's arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The HC had previously set aside the cognizance order, requiring the respondent to obtain a sanction. The respondent reapplied for cognizance, and the Special Court will reassess the case. Given the appellant's custody since August 8, 2024, without a valid cognizance order, the Court ordered the appellant's production within a week and granted bail with strict conditions, warning that non-cooperation could lead to bail cancellation. Pending applications were disposed of. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:30:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766305 The SC allowed the appeal concerning the appellant's arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The HC had previously set aside the cognizance order, requiring the respondent to obtain a sanction. The respondent reapplied for cognizance, and the Special Court will reassess the case. Given the appellant's custody since August 8, 2024, without a valid cognizance order, the Court ordered the appellant's production within a week and granted bail with strict conditions, warning that non-cooperation could lead to bail cancellation. Pending applications were disposed of. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766305