https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766329 The HC set aside the impugned order concerning the assessment year 2018-19, directing the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed taxes within a specified period. The petitioner was required to reverse the credit availed from invoices issued by Jaya Trading Company due to potential fraudulent transactions. The Court emphasized the petitioner's failure to respond to notices and attend hearings, underscoring the importance of compliance in tax investigations. The Court accepted the petitioner's offer to pay 25% of the disputed tax and allowed for further objections before the adjudicating authority, with non-compliance resulting in the restoration of the impugned order. en-us Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:30:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766329 The HC set aside the impugned order concerning the assessment year 2018-19, directing the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed taxes within a specified period. The petitioner was required to reverse the credit availed from invoices issued by Jaya Trading Company due to potential fraudulent transactions. The Court emphasized the petitioner's failure to respond to notices and attend hearings, underscoring the importance of compliance in tax investigations. The Court accepted the petitioner's offer to pay 25% of the disputed tax and allowed for further objections before the adjudicating authority, with non-compliance resulting in the restoration of the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766329