<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460815</link>
    <description>An incorrect cause title in an earlier order was corrected where the proceeding had been described as an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 instead of a bail petition under Section 439. The Court directed substitution of the cause title so that the order accurately reflected the petition, and the Registry was asked to carry out the correction and issue a fresh copy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 00:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=800537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460815</link>
      <description>An incorrect cause title in an earlier order was corrected where the proceeding had been described as an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 instead of a bail petition under Section 439. The Court directed substitution of the cause title so that the order accurately reflected the petition, and the Registry was asked to carry out the correction and issue a fresh copy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>