https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460806 A review application filed beyond the prescribed period without any condonation request was rejected, and the trial court also found the supporting facts to be incorrect. Repeated non-appearance for cross-examination led to several adjournments and left the witness waiting, prompting the court to close cross-examination. The court held that natural justice does not require repeated adjournments where counsel uses delaying tactics, and that evidence must be recorded within a reasonable time without harassing witnesses. The petition challenging the dismissal of the review application and the closure of cross-examination was dismissed as without merit. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:44:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460806 A review application filed beyond the prescribed period without any condonation request was rejected, and the trial court also found the supporting facts to be incorrect. Repeated non-appearance for cross-examination led to several adjournments and left the witness waiting, prompting the court to close cross-examination. The court held that natural justice does not require repeated adjournments where counsel uses delaying tactics, and that evidence must be recorded within a reasonable time without harassing witnesses. The petition challenging the dismissal of the review application and the closure of cross-examination was dismissed as without merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460806