<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI, AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41508</link>
    <description>Customs valuation under Section 14(1) turns on the ordinary international trade price of the goods, not a special concession or discounted invoice price granted only to one buyer. On the recorded facts, the supplier&#039;s correspondence showed US$ 34,000 as the ruling price and US$ 28,000 as a special price in the petitioner&#039;s case, so the authorities were justified in adopting US$ 34,000 for assessment. The court also noted that such factual findings, being supported by evidence and representing a possible view, are not ordinarily open to interference in writ jurisdiction absent an error of law or a finding with no evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI, AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41508</link>
      <description>Customs valuation under Section 14(1) turns on the ordinary international trade price of the goods, not a special concession or discounted invoice price granted only to one buyer. On the recorded facts, the supplier&#039;s correspondence showed US$ 34,000 as the ruling price and US$ 28,000 as a special price in the petitioner&#039;s case, so the authorities were justified in adopting US$ 34,000 for assessment. The court also noted that such factual findings, being supported by evidence and representing a possible view, are not ordinarily open to interference in writ jurisdiction absent an error of law or a finding with no evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>