<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41500</link>
    <description>The amended definition of &quot;related person&quot; in section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was upheld as within Parliament&#039;s legislative competence and not constitutionally infirm. On valuation, mutuality of business interest was essential for the first limb of the definition; where sales were on principal-to-principal terms and the assessee had no reciprocal interest in the buyers&#039; business, the buyers were not &quot;related persons&quot; and resale price could not be adopted for excise assessment. The direction shifting the cost of furnishing a bank guarantee to the Revenue was unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41500</link>
      <description>The amended definition of &quot;related person&quot; in section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was upheld as within Parliament&#039;s legislative competence and not constitutionally infirm. On valuation, mutuality of business interest was essential for the first limb of the definition; where sales were on principal-to-principal terms and the assessee had no reciprocal interest in the buyers&#039; business, the buyers were not &quot;related persons&quot; and resale price could not be adopted for excise assessment. The direction shifting the cost of furnishing a bank guarantee to the Revenue was unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>