<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Late Resolution Plan Rejected as CoC Already Initiated Voting Process Under IBC Section 61(3)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85916</link>
    <description>NCLAT upheld CoC&#039;s decision to reject appellant&#039;s late resolution plan submission in CIRP proceedings. CoC had already initiated voting on three existing plans when appellant submitted request on 13.07.2023 followed by plan on 23.07.2023. CoC&#039;s deliberation revealed appellant&#039;s non-binding bid of Rs.23 crores through Phoenix ARC had expired, raising doubts about resolution integrity. Pinax&#039;s resolution plan secured 97% vote share during 19.07.2023-11.08.2023 voting period. NCLAT found no grounds to interfere with CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom under Section 61(3) of IBC, affirming Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval dated 20.12.2024. Appeal dismissed as appellant failed to demonstrate procedural violations or legal infirmity in CoC&#039;s decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:23:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=800218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Late Resolution Plan Rejected as CoC Already Initiated Voting Process Under IBC Section 61(3)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85916</link>
      <description>NCLAT upheld CoC&#039;s decision to reject appellant&#039;s late resolution plan submission in CIRP proceedings. CoC had already initiated voting on three existing plans when appellant submitted request on 13.07.2023 followed by plan on 23.07.2023. CoC&#039;s deliberation revealed appellant&#039;s non-binding bid of Rs.23 crores through Phoenix ARC had expired, raising doubts about resolution integrity. Pinax&#039;s resolution plan secured 97% vote share during 19.07.2023-11.08.2023 voting period. NCLAT found no grounds to interfere with CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom under Section 61(3) of IBC, affirming Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval dated 20.12.2024. Appeal dismissed as appellant failed to demonstrate procedural violations or legal infirmity in CoC&#039;s decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:23:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>