<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Manpower Recruitment Services Under Time and Material Projects Subject to Service Tax - Penalties Modified</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85912</link>
    <description>CESTAT determined services provided under &quot;Time and Material Projects&quot; constituted Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service, not Consulting Engineer Service, following precedent established in similar Philips Electronics India agreements. Service tax demand upheld as manpower supply service. The appellant&#039;s ST-3 returns declared services as exempt under Consulting Engineer Service until 16.05.2008, reflecting bona fide interpretation rather than willful suppression. Extended limitation period found inapplicable. Tribunal modified order confirming demand for normal period, maintained penalties under Sections 76 and 77, but set aside Section 78 penalty due to absence of deliberate mis-declaration. Appeal partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:23:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=800214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Manpower Recruitment Services Under Time and Material Projects Subject to Service Tax - Penalties Modified</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85912</link>
      <description>CESTAT determined services provided under &quot;Time and Material Projects&quot; constituted Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service, not Consulting Engineer Service, following precedent established in similar Philips Electronics India agreements. Service tax demand upheld as manpower supply service. The appellant&#039;s ST-3 returns declared services as exempt under Consulting Engineer Service until 16.05.2008, reflecting bona fide interpretation rather than willful suppression. Extended limitation period found inapplicable. Tribunal modified order confirming demand for normal period, maintained penalties under Sections 76 and 77, but set aside Section 78 penalty due to absence of deliberate mis-declaration. Appeal partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:23:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>