<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 820 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766273</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263. The AO had properly examined and allowed deduction u/s 54F after verifying all conditions, including the assessee&#039;s investment of Rs.89,10,000 in properties meeting the threshold requirements. The PCIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was held to be merely a review of the assessment order, which exceeded the scope of Section 263. The tribunal found the AO&#039;s decision neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:23:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=800184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 820 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766273</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263. The AO had properly examined and allowed deduction u/s 54F after verifying all conditions, including the assessee&#039;s investment of Rs.89,10,000 in properties meeting the threshold requirements. The PCIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was held to be merely a review of the assessment order, which exceeded the scope of Section 263. The tribunal found the AO&#039;s decision neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>