https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766293 Belated service of the impugned GST notices through the portal was treated as sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal against the demand order. The Madras HC accepted the petitioner's explanation and noted that the respondents did not seriously oppose condonation if sufficient cause was shown. The delay of 142 days was therefore condoned, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766293 Belated service of the impugned GST notices through the portal was treated as sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal against the demand order. The Madras HC accepted the petitioner's explanation and noted that the respondents did not seriously oppose condonation if sufficient cause was shown. The delay of 142 days was therefore condoned, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits. Case-Laws GST Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766293