<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41485</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitions of the 10 petitioners in list B, directing the respondents to issue exemption orders. For other petitioners, a committee was to be constituted to reconsider their applications based on the July 1982 notification. The court made suggestions to prevent misuse of imported cars for disabled persons and disposed of the petitions with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:54:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41485</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitions of the 10 petitioners in list B, directing the respondents to issue exemption orders. For other petitioners, a committee was to be constituted to reconsider their applications based on the July 1982 notification. The court made suggestions to prevent misuse of imported cars for disabled persons and disposed of the petitions with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>