https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41448 The Court rejected the petitioners' claim for deduction of post-manufacturing expenses, including various items, as the Supreme Court clarified that only specific deductions like trade discount, excise duty, and averaged freight were permissible for excise duty assessment. The Court directed the Assistant Collector to reevaluate one specific claim regarding deductible freight based on Supreme Court guidelines, dismissing other claims but allowing the possibility of permissible deductions if supported by relevant information within a specified timeframe. The petition was ultimately dismissed with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:09:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41448 The Court rejected the petitioners' claim for deduction of post-manufacturing expenses, including various items, as the Supreme Court clarified that only specific deductions like trade discount, excise duty, and averaged freight were permissible for excise duty assessment. The Court directed the Assistant Collector to reevaluate one specific claim regarding deductible freight based on Supreme Court guidelines, dismissing other claims but allowing the possibility of permissible deductions if supported by relevant information within a specified timeframe. The petition was ultimately dismissed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41448