https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41447 A writ petition challenging refusal of excise exemption was held maintainable because the existence of an appellate remedy did not, on these facts, provide full and effective relief. On construction of the exemption notifications, goods described as specified goods did not cease to be excisable goods, and a manufacturer clearing both specified goods and other excisable goods could claim the higher aggregate exemption limit where the scheme so allowed. The authorities were found to have wrongly confined the assessee to the lower limit, and the impugned excise orders were quashed with consequential refund relief. en-us Wed, 05 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:06:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41447 A writ petition challenging refusal of excise exemption was held maintainable because the existence of an appellate remedy did not, on these facts, provide full and effective relief. On construction of the exemption notifications, goods described as specified goods did not cease to be excisable goods, and a manufacturer clearing both specified goods and other excisable goods could claim the higher aggregate exemption limit where the scheme so allowed. The authorities were found to have wrongly confined the assessee to the lower limit, and the impugned excise orders were quashed with consequential refund relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41447