<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41445</link>
    <description>The court found the seizure of 115 video cassettes to be without jurisdiction and ordered their return to the petitioners. However, the seizure of the telephone was deemed within jurisdiction, and the petitioners were not entitled to relief regarding the telephone. The petition was allowed in part, with each party directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41445</link>
      <description>The court found the seizure of 115 video cassettes to be without jurisdiction and ordered their return to the petitioners. However, the seizure of the telephone was deemed within jurisdiction, and the petitioners were not entitled to relief regarding the telephone. The petition was allowed in part, with each party directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>