https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766198 Services rendered to a governmental authority under a work contract for laying cable under or alongside roads in the NOFN project were held not to qualify for the exemption claimed under the notification relied on by the assessee. The Supreme Court treated the matter as fit for remand to the original authority solely for recalculation of the demand, with cum-tax benefit to be extended on the gross amount charged by the assessee. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:02:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766198 Services rendered to a governmental authority under a work contract for laying cable under or alongside roads in the NOFN project were held not to qualify for the exemption claimed under the notification relied on by the assessee. The Supreme Court treated the matter as fit for remand to the original authority solely for recalculation of the demand, with cum-tax benefit to be extended on the gross amount charged by the assessee. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766198