<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 755 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766208</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals). Liberty was also granted to seek implementation of the Order-in-Original before that appellate authority, leaving the substantive dispute to be considered in the prescribed appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:02:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=799603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 755 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766208</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals). Liberty was also granted to seek implementation of the Order-in-Original before that appellate authority, leaving the substantive dispute to be considered in the prescribed appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>