https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766211 Classification dispute concerning Lamda Cyhalothrin Technical was addressed on the basis that the Directorate General of Foreign Trade had previously classified the product under tariff heading CTH 38089199, and Merchandise Exports from India (MEIS) scrips had been issued accordingly; the prior administrative classification was treated as determinative and no reason was found to disturb that classification, resulting in the maintenance of MEIS entitlement and the dismissal of the challenge. The operative effect is affirmation of the tariff classification and preservation of export incentive scrips. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766211 Classification dispute concerning Lamda Cyhalothrin Technical was addressed on the basis that the Directorate General of Foreign Trade had previously classified the product under tariff heading CTH 38089199, and Merchandise Exports from India (MEIS) scrips had been issued accordingly; the prior administrative classification was treated as determinative and no reason was found to disturb that classification, resulting in the maintenance of MEIS entitlement and the dismissal of the challenge. The operative effect is affirmation of the tariff classification and preservation of export incentive scrips. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766211