<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 763 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766216</link>
    <description>A contractual sharing of service tax borne by an assessee as part of commission-linked insurance auxiliary services was held allowable as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The payment was made to secure and retain business, and the statutory service tax liability lay on the recipient under reverse charge, not on the assessee. Explanation 1 did not apply because there was no legal prohibition on the contractual arrangement itself. The recipient&#039;s failure to deposit the tax with the Government did not alter the character of the assessee&#039;s expenditure, as any default was attributable to the recipient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:26:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=799595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 763 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766216</link>
      <description>A contractual sharing of service tax borne by an assessee as part of commission-linked insurance auxiliary services was held allowable as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The payment was made to secure and retain business, and the statutory service tax liability lay on the recipient under reverse charge, not on the assessee. Explanation 1 did not apply because there was no legal prohibition on the contractual arrangement itself. The recipient&#039;s failure to deposit the tax with the Government did not alter the character of the assessee&#039;s expenditure, as any default was attributable to the recipient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>