https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766236 Enhanced GST liability from 12% to 18% was treated as payable for work executed during the relevant period, and the Court found no justification to deny the differential 6% amount where the State GST Department had also accepted the liability. The petitioner was therefore entitled to payment of the GST differential, with interest applicable if payment was not made within the stipulated time. The Court also rejected the objection based on an alternative contractual dispute-resolution remedy, holding that no disputed questions of fact arose and that the writ remedy was not barred on that ground. Relief was granted accordingly. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766236 Enhanced GST liability from 12% to 18% was treated as payable for work executed during the relevant period, and the Court found no justification to deny the differential 6% amount where the State GST Department had also accepted the liability. The petitioner was therefore entitled to payment of the GST differential, with interest applicable if payment was not made within the stipulated time. The Court also rejected the objection based on an alternative contractual dispute-resolution remedy, holding that no disputed questions of fact arose and that the writ remedy was not barred on that ground. Relief was granted accordingly. Case-Laws GST Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766236